|
FAA Related Links: Salt Lake City Airport - See maps prepared by the Salt Lake City International Airport showing where jets fly now and where they would fly under the FAA's plan. Read the Airport's well-reasoned and detailed rejection of the FAA's plan. Also read why pilots think the FAA's plan is unsafe, and see letters of concern from the County and Community Councils. View/save a Fact Sheet - large file with color photos containing an explanation of the FAA proposal and how it affects you...good for presentations (MS Word, 2,947.5kB) View/save SOC's comments letter to the FAA with our position on the FAA proposal...may prove helpful when writing the FAA (MS Word, 89kB) View/save SOC's comment period extension request to the FAA to allow more time for public comment on the proposal (MS Word, 21kB) View EIS Scoping Comment by the Town of Alta on the FAA Scoping Proposal View EIS Scoping Comment by Alta Ski Lifts on the FAA Scoping Proposal |
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has been developing an initiative that will dramatically affect the quality of life for the majority of residents in the Salt Lake Valley, and not for the first time. Proposed initiative alternatives would route half of arriving flights over the east side of the valley and four wilderness areas rather than above the Oquirrh Mountains and the Great Salt Lake where most flights currently approach the airport. Save Our Canyons requested that the FAA conduct an Environmental Impact Statement before taking any action and is encouraging the FAA to adopt our "Clear Sky Alternative."
In response to considerable heat on this issue, the FAA put its plan for extensive and high-impact flight-plan changes into the NEPA Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process. Information on the proposal for the changes, given the name Northern Utah Airspace Initiative (NUAI), can be viewed on the FAA's NUAI website.
Due to pressure brought to bear by SOC, Congressman Jim Matheson, Salt Lake City Council, Salt Lake City Department of Airports, Salt Lake County Council, and many City and Community Councils, the FAA grudgingly extended the public scoping period for its initiative to May 30th. We were initially seeking a 60-day extension to better allow the public to comment on this complex and highly contentious issue. See SOC's extension request letter posted in the sidebar above for more information.
Curious as to the circumstances of a previous FAA proposal for flight-path changes, we contacted Mr. Louis Miller, a former Director of the Salt Lake City International Airport and now Executive Director of the Hillsborough County Aviation Authority's Tampa Airport, for comments on this one. Following is his reply in part:
It is true that while I was in Salt Lake City I was very much opposed to changing the flight tracks to allow for down wind approaches on the east side of the airport. We discussed this in great detail when the new runway was opened in 1995 based on the FAA's statement that it would improve the flow of traffic for arrivals. However, the FAA could not demonstrate to me that it was necessary based on the volume of arrivals and departures to and from the airport. As a matter of fact, it was clear to me that the airport could meet its capacity requirements for at least the next twenty years without any changes to the current utilization of the four runways, including the airspace restrictions that were in place.--from an e-mail message dated June 24, 2002
FAA Public Hearings / Salt Lake Valley
Study Timeline
|
Utah
Air Travel Commission opposes FAA proposal
Deseret News
Sunday, June 6, 2004. An influential group of politicians,
businesspeople and other leaders in the city have added their
names to the list of organizations and individuals opposed to the FAA's
Airspace Initiative.
Travel
Group Joins Foes of East Bench Air Route
The Salt
Lake Tirbune June 3, 2004. Utah's Air Travel
Commission has become the latest group to oppose the FAA's proposed
redesign of the airspace around Salt Lake City.
Delta
opposes FAA airspace proposal
Deseret News
January 6,
2004. SLC's largest airline carrier joins the SLC Airport in
disputing the need for the FAA's NUAI proposal, which would re-route
jetliners at low altitudes above Wasatch wilderness and recreational
areas; Delta Airlines VP says the FAA has a solution for a non-existent
problem; FAA plans to begin a public comment period of at least 30 days
on its Draft Environmental Impact Statement in May 2004.
Jet-noise
study begins
The Salt Lake
Tribune
September 13, 2003. The Federal Aviation Administration
begins a noise study to determine levels of aircraft noise at numerous
sites along the Wasatch Front in an attempt to predict how the NUAI
proposal would affect ambient noise levels; one wilderness-area reading
shows a flyover noise jump nearly equal to a saw cutting sheet metal.
Matheson
fights east-side flight path
The Salt Lake
Tribune July
31, 2003. Puzzled by the need for airspace changes above the
Salt Lake Valley, US Representative Jim Matheson joins forces with US
Rep. Chris Cannon to combat the FAA's current NUAI plans, bringing
together West and East Salt Lake Valley constituencies; FAA Controller
George Wetherell cites increased local traffic in 2001 as
justification.
Air
traffic may roar over S.L.'s east side
Deseret News
July 17,
2003. FAA representatives conduct a media briefing in which
FAA's traffic volume and safety concerns are presented; Salt Lake
County Councilman Skousen mentions concerns over the possibility of
masked airline attempts to avoid municipalities' airspace overflight
taxes.
Matheson
Against Flight Path Changes
The Salt Lake
Tribune May
20, 2003. Rep. Jim Matheson sends a letter of concern to the
FAA expressing displeasure over the intrusiveness of proposed airspace
changes and low level of public involvement, challenging the need for
changes with a depressed air travel market based on outdated FAA flight
volume estimates; cites constituent alarm.
FAA
extends deadline for airspace comment
Deseret News
May 17,
2003. Rep. Jim Matheson chastises the FAA for failure to
extend the public comment period on airspace change, insists on
additional 14-day extension, to be followed by 1-year plan development
period.
FAA
Asked to Extend Comment Time on Route Proposal
The Salt Lake
Tribune May
14, 2003. Salt Lake County resolution urges the FAA to
extend public comment period on NUAI proposal by 60 days.
SLC
Resolution Challenges East Bench Flight Path
The Salt Lake
Tribune May
14, 2003. Salt Lake City resolution says FAA should not air
routes from airspace over unpopulated to heavily populated areas;
charges the case proving need for the changes has not been made.
Longer
comment time sought on N. Utah airspace initiative
Deseret News
May 14,
2003. Director Campbell of the Salt Lake International
Airport and the Salt Lake County Council urge the FAA to extend by 60
days the period for public comment on proposed flight-path changes,
citing too little time for public involvement.
FAA
flight plan criticized
Deseret News
May 8,
2003. Director Tim Campbell of the Salt Lake City Airport
criticizes FAA flight-routing proposal as unnecessary and based on
outdated traffic projections, and says newer technology may suffice
instead to meet any flight volume increases; he will present his
findings to the Salt Lake City Council.
Proposed
east flight path concerns county leaders
Deseret News
May 7,
2003. Salt Lake County Mayor Workman sends letter to FAA
regarding NUAI proposal, citing mountain safety, tourism, quality of
life concerns; Salt Lake County to prepare a resolution citing
reservations over noise, public safety, socio-economic and visual
impacts, and possible disruption to endangered species.
Concerns
Grow Over East-Side Air Route Plans
The Salt Lake
Tribune May
6, 2003. Local governments throughout the Salt Lake Valley
express official reservations and alarm over the FAA initiative.
S.L.
County Weighing Bench Flight Plan
The Salt Lake
Tribune May
1, 2003. Salt Lake County Council mulls the pros, cons of a
potential resolution that would lay out County concerns over FAA
proposal alternatives.
(Opinion)
Straight and Narrow
The Salt Lake
Tribune
April 30, 2003. Discussion on the FAA's Northern Utah
Airspace Initiative should focus on safety and wilderness issues and
avoid low-blow politics.
County
is unlikely to ground plane plan
Deseret News
April 30,
2003. Councilman Russell Skousen encounters County Council
apathy on proposed resolution critical of FAA move.
Flight
Path Opposed
The Salt Lake
Tribune
April 29, 2003. Salt Lake County appears ready to poised to
question the FAA's Northern Utah Airspace Initiative; Councilman
Skousen questions potential economic impacts on Northern Utah.
Airlines
Feel Cut in Ridership
The Salt Lake
Tribune
April 9, 2003. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and
war jitters cut even more deeply into falling airline passenger
traffic; as ridership falls by 16% systemwide, local flights out of SL
Airport will likely be reduced, says Delta.
East
Bench May Get Air Traffic
The Salt Lake
Tribune
April 9, 2003. Claiming air traffic congestion concerns, FAA
launches an Environmental Impact Study on its Salt Lake Valley
proposal; seeks some public input on tight schedule; proposed
re-routing is only 1 of some 12 FAA airspace initiatives nationwide.
FAA
Details Proposed Jet Routes for Skeptical East-Siders
The Salt Lake
Tribune
March 19, 2003. Local FAA public comment meetings reveal
extensive local homeowner doubt and more than a little resistance, in
reaction to FAA rerouting plans.
Proposed
flight paths into Salt Lake airport raise ire
Deseret News
March 19,
2003. During formal public unveiling, FAA admits 3-5 minute
flight delays are of "negligible" impact; Salt Lake County, south Davis
County citizens express consternation over FAA plans, and Salt Lake
City and Farmington city officials are also concerned; Salt Lake Valley
was only 1 of 4 national areas to experience any 2002 flight volume
growth.
Rerouted
McCarran jet traffic questions remain
Las Vegas
Review-Journal
March 13, 2003. Concerned citizens of Enterprise pack public
meeting on FAA flight-plan revisions, but the FAA never shows up;
residents find the FAA's approach to the changes "sneaky", say tail
numbers can be read off low-flying jumbo aircraft.
Rerouted
air traffic springs noisy surprise
Las Vegas
Review-Journal
March 8, 2003. In one community, the little town of
Enterprise in Las Vegas, residents are stunned as the FAA begins
teeth-rattling low-altitude aircraft routing over a previously quiet
area near McCarran International Airport; local officials say they were
never informed of FAA changes; residents say agency notices for public
comment meetings were posted according to minimum requirements only.
Changed Air Routes Could Threaten Outdoor
Solitude link removed*
The Salt Lake
Tribune
October 20, 2002. Save Our Canyons and the Town of Alta join
forces to urge the FAA to conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement
process, citing skier and hiker concerns over noise; FAA manager
Mawhorter states that agency is striving to "create zero impact".
Managing
Overhead: Save Our Canyons battles FAA over proposed flight-path changes
Salt
Lake City
Weekly October 10, 2002. Citing an expected 30%
growth in air traffic, the Federal Aviation Administration floats
several alternative air traffic scenarios, featuring frequent
low-flying jumbo aircraft over neighborhoods and protected wilderness
areas; Save Our Canyons disputes the FAA's pre-9/11 analysis of traffic
pressures, urging the FAA to prepare a missing Environmental Impact
Statement for public scrutiny.
Airline
Pollution: The Sky Has Its Limits
Time Magazine
Online Edition
May 7, 2001. The FAA and the aviation industry are not
keeping their marital ears peeled on our behalf for the seemingly
endless expansion of noise pollution. Maybe it's up to all of us
to watch out for our own mental health--perhaps even by getting
involved with politics?