Frequently Asked Questions


Who Is SOC?

Where does SOC's funding come from?

What positive initiatives has SOC undertaken?

What are some of SOC's important accomplishments?

Is SOC interested only in the tri-canyon area (Big Cottonwood, Little Cottonwood, Millcreek Canyons)?

When is SOC is reactive rather than proactive?

What criteria does SOC use to decide whether or not to take on an issue?

What is SOC's position on ski resorts?

What is SOC's position on real estate development in the Wasatch?

What is SOC's position regarding dogs in the Wasatch?

What is SOC's position on mountain bikes in the Wasatch?

Why has SOC traditionally opposed helicopter skiing in the Wasatch?

How can I become active in SOC initiatives?


Who Is SOC?     to the top

SOC is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt conservation organization, founded in 1972, as a consequence of escalating development threats to the Wasatch Mountains. It has about 1,200 members, a staff of three, a ten person Board of Trustees and more than 100 volunteers every year.

Where does SOC's funding come from?     to the top

90-95% of SOC's funds comes from its members as individual donors. The majority of its resources, however, come from dedicated volunteers who contribute volunteer hours equivalent to more than SOC's total annual budget - a classic grass-roots endeavor.

What positive initiatives has SOC undertaken?     to the top

There have been many positive initiatives over the years, among them:

What are some of SOC's important accomplishments?     to the top

The designation of Utah's first Wilderness Area, Lone Peak in 1978 was due to the initiative of SOC. SOC also played a key role in creation of Utah's only other Wilderness Areas including, Twin Peaks, Mt Olympus, Mt. Timpanogos, Mt Nebo, Deseret Peak and the Wellsvilles. SOC has been credited for keeping the 2002 Olympic Games venues out of Big and Little Cottonwood and Millcreek Canyons. SOC was an important player in the preservation of Snake Creek Canyon, Willow Heights and Bear Trap Fork areas in Big Cottonwood and Yellow Fork Canyon in the Oquirrhs. SOC has stopped Snowbird from expanding into White Pine Canyon three times and kept Scotties Bowl out of its permit area. SOC stopped an alpine slide and five acres of new parking lots at Solitude Ski Resort. It has helped create important zoning documents such as the Canyons Master Plan, the Foothills Canyons and Overlay Zone, and the Watershed Management Plan. SOC won lawsuits against the Forest Service over Snowbasin Ski Resort and against Salt Lake County over the Harper's Gravel Pit.

Is SOC interested only in the tri-canyon area (Big Cottonwood, Little Cottonwood, Millcreek Canyon)s?     to the top

SOC is interested in preserving the wildness of the entire Wasatch Range, from the Wellsvilles to Mt. Nebo. Due to limited resources, SOC has focused mainly on the mountains and canyons on Salt Lake Valley's eastern boundary, the most heavily used Forest Service lands in the entire United States.

When is SOC reactive rather than proactive?     to the top

SOC's role is to protect the beauty and wildness of the Wasatch Range. This often takes the form of vigorous opposition to schemes that it finds to be destructive, an overall role it regards as positive. For example, to achieve effective opposition to a real estate development scheme or ski resort expansion a strong "no" response is required. Development threats to the Wasatch are constantly arising. It is not SOC that is proposing harmful development schemes, but it is SOC that often steps into the fray to protect the Wasatch.

What criteria does SOC use to decide whether or not to take on an issue?     to the top

Commonly the criterion is whether or not a proposal, if it were carried out, would permanently change the character of the Wasatch. Buildings, roads, expanded ski resorts, and real estate development all impact the Wasatch in a permanent manner. What will the Wasatch be like in 100 years?

What is SOC's position on ski resorts?     to the top

Most SOC members, volunteers, trustees and staff are skiers and snowboarders at resorts as well as in the backcountry. SOC has been intimately involved in the public processes required during the Forest Service's consideration of ski resorts' Master Development Plans. (Remember that many ski resorts are mostly on federal land.) This has been a major undertaking involving thousands of volunteer and staff hours. Through the years, SOC has opposed only a small number of ski area development proposals.

What is SOC's position on real estate development in the Wasatch?     to the top

Roughly 20% of the land area in the Wasatch Mountains is privately owned and consequently open to the strong possibility of development. Generally SOC opposes real estate development in the Wasatch, especially that which threatens the watershed and natural wildness of the mountains and canyons. It does recognize that a certain amount of development will take place, but this should be minimized as much as possible and, of course, be subject to the strict enforcement of applicable zoning ordinances, most specifically the Foothills and Canyons Overlay Zone Ordinance, which was enacted in 1998 supported by a broad-based, bi-partisan group of citizens, conservation activists and Salt Lake County officials.

What is SOC's position regarding dogs in the Wasatch?     to the top

Dogs in the Wasatch can present a watershed problem and can create user conflict, but the presence of dogs in the Wasatch does not result in a permanent change in the character of the land. Local governments and the Forest Service need to manage watershed problems and user conflict arising from dogs in the Wasatch. SOC carefully watches the dog debate, but has not found it to have a significant enough impact to become engaged.

What is SOC's position on mountain bikes in the Wasatch?     to the top

While the use of mountain bikes does create potential user conflicts, there are well-established rules for the right-of-way on Forest Service paths. SOC believes that the presence of mountain bikes does not represent any irreversible change in the character of the canyons or mountains. Local governments and the Forest Service need to manage user conflicts. Using the best preservation tool at hand, SOC is actively working toward the expansion of the boundaries of the wilderness areas in the Wasatch and bikes are not allowed in such areas. Mountain bike enthusiasts, when they review SOC's wilderness proposal, will find that the proposed restrictions on mountain biking are minimal.

Why has SOC traditionally opposed helicopter skiing in the Wasatch?     to the top

The use of helicopters in the Wasatch is not the same as the construction of a building, widening a road or cutting a new ski run, but helicopters do represent an intrusive and noisy recreational use. The central Wasatch area is very small in size and is the most heavily used of Forest Service lands. Heli-skiing represents a disproportionate and cumulative negative impact on all other recreationists using the Wasatch's limited backcountry resources. It also significantly threatens the nesting success and continued survival of Golden Eagles in the Wasatch.

How can I become active in SOC initiatives?     to the top

Call the SOC office (801) 363-SAVE or sign up for our action alerts here or our volunteer alerts here.  There is always a task or initiative that is in great need of your volunteer labor, whether or not you have specialized skills. Without a dedicated and active membership, Save Our Canyons would not be able to do the work we do.  Please consider joining SOC by clicking here.  You can also stay informed of what SOC is doing by regularly visiting our webpage.