As Americans show little
or no restraint in their insatiable
appetites for more, bigger, better, entitled in fact to
disproportionate
quantities of non-renewable resources while remaining exempt from any
global
effort to heal and restore the world, I have to wonder why we
deliberately deny
the natural world any respect. We all know that the Bush administration
feels
no qualms in either altering science or ignoring science to fit its big
business agenda, but the irritating part of it all for me personally
rests with
the religious justification to ignore the interconnected web of all
existence.
I almost have to ask: Is religion harmful to sustaining life on our
planet?
I can’t help but notice that America is the most religious nation in the western
world, with
more than an astounding 50% of the population dutifully practicing
their faith
in houses of worship each weekend. Europe on the other hand, finds its historical
churches filled
with tourists while natives make virtually no room in their lives for
the
actual practice of religion. And yet we must concede that America for all its religiosity remains the lead
sinner in the
world for not only abusing the environment but also for its hubris in
failing
to cooperate with other nations to make the earth more habitable.
Not all religions are harmful to the
environment. Although
the new wave of evangelical faith might herald the biblical
proclamation that
man (sic) holds dominion over the earth, (and shows the natural world
who’s boss),
many mainline faiths argue that God demands that we hold the earth as a
sacred
trust and that faith compels us to be custodians of this magnificent
creation.
I would naturally support the argument that our charge in life is to
serve as
custodians for the earth, but the nature of the debate drives me crazy.
The
religious world, be it from the extreme right or moderate center gets
hopelessly entangled in a senseless debate: Figuring out the intent of
the
Creator. Some insist that He (sic) has placed us in charge as though
this earth
was all meant for us to enjoy, and when the earth runs out of goodies
for the
next generation, He (sic) will provide a solution. Others contend, yet
still
maintaining that they know what God
has in mind, that the deity will not renew resources for our children
and
grandchildren down the line, but that we better take care of what we
have
because that’s all we get.
Arguing if there is a Creator or not, or what
the Creator
really has in mind, seems to me a monumental waste of time because it
can’t
ever be proven. Rather than focus on the Creator,
isn’t it time that religion turn its attention more towards the Creation itself. Personally I find more
spiritual merit in the awe and beauty inspired by the intricate web of
being
than in worrying about whether or not God exists and what this God
wants us to
do.
New discoveries in the biological sciences
reveal that the
interconnected web of all existence is more profoundly connected than
even our
wildest imaginations might fathom. Giraffes in sub-Saharan Africa, for
example, are especially fond of eating the leaves of the Massasa tree.
As long
as not too many of the leaves on a particular tree are consumed, the
tree and
the giraffe cohabit harmoniously. But when a hungry giraffe consumes so
many
leaves that the tree’s well-being is threatened, the tree raises the
acidic
content in its leaves. The giraffes no longer find them tasteful, and
stop
eating them. Ecologists are finding that the relationships in any
particular
ecosystem are complex and pervasive. Every species of plant and animal
has a
part to play in the health of the whole.
Religion in America seems preoccupied with divining sacred truth
(as though
that were possible), and prescribing answers found in scripture written
in a
pre-scientific world. The religious sensibilities revealed in
scripture, like
sharing with those who have less than you and caring for those who are
in need,
gain credibility in the remarkable story of the giraffes and the
Massasa tree:
When individuals consume too much, the health of the whole is
threatened. To
extend the metaphor to these times, our selfish consumptions to feed
our
affluent lifestyles leaves a bitter taste. Some of us are beginning to
notice.
The
spiritual discipline required of us today calls for living with respect
for the
interconnected web of all existence, and humbly recognizing our small
part in
life’s intricate processes. Once we stop second-guessing what the
Creator is
thinking, and move our religious commitments to the Creation itself,
then we
can begin to repair the harm we’ve exacted upon this gentle earth. I
hope that
religion starts to emphasize the discipline of humility and respect and
compassion for the infinite ecosystems that sustain the world. The
Creator may
inspire debate, but the Creation is too beautiful and fragile to
ignore. It is
our home and the home of everything that pulsates with the miracle of
life.
Religion must become a viable partner in saving the world from
ourselves.

Rev. Tom
Goldsmith came to
the First Unitarian Church in Salt Lake City in 1987 after serving two Massachusetts churches in the Boston area. Originally from New York City, he graduated Harvard Divinity School in 1975. Tom has
published widely, having an Op-Ed
column in the Boston Herald for three years prior to moving west, and
writing
for Modern Bride Magazine, and a host of local periodicals in the
Intermountain
West. He plays bass in a folk group, enjoys hiking the canyons, and is
married
to Mary Tull. Together they have five children.
BACK